ORG 827 Topic 7 Benchmark The Value of Taking Risks GCU

ORG 827 Topic 7 Benchmark The Value of Taking Risks GCU

ORG 827 Topic 7 Benchmark The Value of Taking Risks GCU

$20

In stock

$20

  • Description
  • Reviews (0)

Description

ORG 827 Topic 7 Benchmark The Value of Taking Risks GCU

Leaders often operate in risk-averse environments, modeling tepid behavior to followers who, in turn, avoid putting any pressure on the system. This mentality destroys creativity and innovation, often resulting in catastrophic failure. However, when well-reasoned, deliberate risk is embraced, organizations can move forward with extraordinary effectiveness. It is a leader’s responsibility to mitigate possible adverse consequences of the risks. In a complex dynamic system, downstream effects can be difficult to determine, but measures must be taken to assess the impacts of decisions. When a concern is identified, corrective action can be taken. Cultural differences can also play a significant role when leaders engage in risk-taking when making strategic decisions. Leaders must be cognizant of how their behavior can impact collocated teams as well as cross-cultural virtual organizations. In this assignment, you will revise your prior work on the theoretical approach to leadership and explore the leader’s role in taking risks when making strategic decisions, evaluating risk mitigation strategies, evaluating organizational structures, and managing risk in collocated and virtual global environments.

General Requirements:

  • Refer to your submission for the Topic 2 assignment, “Benchmark – Leading Strategic Decision Making.”
  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral-level writing. The manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Directions:

Part 1

Present a revised version (1,500-1,800 words total) of the paper “Benchmark – Leading Strategic Decision Making” that makes improvements in the caliber of the writing and incorporates instructor feedback regarding content and writing. Include the following in your submission:

  1. A reflection (250-300 words) that provides a bulleted list of the changes you made to the paper and discusses your revision process including how you incorporated your instructor’s feedback into the revised version. Similar to an abstract, this section will receive its own page following the title page and preceding the introduction to the paper.
  2. The revised paper that incorporates instructor feedback; clarifies the thesis statement and solidifies supporting arguments; edits for grammar, spelling, and punctuation; adjusts word choice to display professional and scholarly language; and adjusts sentence structure for improved readability.

Part 2

Write an additional 1,250-1,500 words discussing the leader’s role in taking risks when making strategic decisions, evaluating risk mitigation strategies, evaluating organizational structures, and managing risk in both collocated and virtual global environments. This section should flow naturally from the revised paper. So, you may also need to revise your introduction and thesis statement to allow the papers to connect. Include the following:

  1. A research-based explanation of why it is important for leaders to take risks when making strategic decisions.
  2. A research-based evaluation of risk mitigation strategies. Which strategies most probably reduce the likelihood of adverse effects of the decisions?
  3. A research-based discussion of the organizational structures most conducive to risk-taking. Why are some organizational structures better than others for encouraging risk-taking? (Benchmarks C6.1: Evaluate organizational structures and determine the feasibility of each.)
  4. A description of at least two differences in risk-taking when making decisions in collocated versus cross-cultural virtual organizations.

Course Tutor helps in providing the best essay writing service. If you need 100% original papers for ORG 827 Topic 7 Benchmark The Value of Taking Risks GCU, then contact us through call or live chat.

ORG 827 Topic 7 Benchmark The Value of Taking Risks GCU

Best ORG 827 Topic 7 Benchmark The Value of Taking Risks GCU

ORG 827 Topic 7 Benchmark The Value of Taking Risks GCU

ACCT 553 DeVryBIAM 500 DeVryCIS 500 STRCIS 558 STRENG 105 GCUFIN 390 DeVryFIN 504 GCUHCA 545 GCUHCA 699 GCUHLT 306 GCUHLT 362 GCUHLT 555 GCUHLT 610 GCUHLT 665 GCUHOSP 594 DeVryHRM 600 DeVryMAT 144 GCUMGMT 600MGT 599 STRMGT 655 GCUMKT 373 GCUPSY 362 GCUPSY 565 GCUPSY 575 GCUPSY 665 GCUSOC 102 GCUSOC 320 GCUSOC 372 GCUSOC 412 GCUNSG 6440 SUHIM 515 GCUNSG 4029 SUHIM 615 GCUNSG 3029 SUNSG 4055 SUNSG 6630 SUNSG 6005 SUCRMJ 310PSY 510 GCUCRMJ 300 DevryCRMJ 425SPD 200 GCU, HLT 490 GCU ,ECH 340 GCU , ECH 440 GCU , ECH 355 GCU ,ECH 350 GCU ,LDR 461 GCU ,ECH 425 GCU ,REL 212 STR ,SCI 115 STR ,CIS 505 STR ,JUS 652 GCUMGT 640 GCUCIS 527 STRSOC 436 GCU,ACC 502 GCUFIN 504 GCU ,MATH 260 DeVry ,ETHC 445 DeVry ,ECET 220 DeVry , CARD 405 DeVryNETW 203 DeVryNETW 205 DeVryECET 365 DeVry ,MATH 270 DeVry ,PHYS 310 DeVry, BIB 106 GCU ,CIS 512 STR ,SYM 506 GCU ,ECN 601 GCU  ,BIAM 570 DeVryPSY 402 GCU , SOC 480 GCU , HUM 112 STR , PHI 210 STR,  ACC 667 GCU,  ACC 622 GCU,  ACC 623 GCU,  ENTR 510 DeVryDNP 840 GCU , BIO 550 GCU , HRM 420 DeVry , ACC 690 GCU  , HCA 807 GCU , ACC 650 GCU , REET 420 DeVry , MIS 605 GCU , ECET 350 DeVry , ENTR 530 DeVry , PSY 102 GCU , MIS 600 GCU , TCH 539 GCU , SPD 300 GCU , SPD 320 GCU , ESL 533 GCU

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.


Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.